Modeling liver cancer with syngeneic hepa 1-6: an update

Depending on the stage of disease, HCC can be treated with surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and radiation.^[4] Current clinical trials are tackling unresectable or advanced stage HCC with mono or combination immunotherapy, monoclonal antibodies or oncolytic virus therapy.^[1-4] These approaches have demonstrated tumor shrinkage and improved survival, but are not curative. Hence, there is a need for improved treatment options. Labcorp has developed the syngeneic HCC model, Hepa 1-6, for preclinical evaluation of immunomodulatory drug candidates.

Hepa 1-6 is a murine hepatoma derived from the BW7756 hepatoma that arose spontaneously in C57L/J mice, which contrasts with most available hepatoma models (BNL, A.7R.1, MH-129, MH134 and MH-22A) that are chemically transformed or induced lines. Therefore, the Hepa 1-6 tumor model established in immunocompetent mice represents a clinically relevant model for preclinical testing of immunotherapy.

Review of Earlier Data

In our 2018 Hepa 1-6 Model Spotlight, we presented initial subcutaneous growth of the model and response data following dosing initiation with small but established tumors (mean tumor volume ~80-90 mm³). Treatment of Hepa 1-6 with checkpoint inhibitors in vivo was extremely effective against early stage disease, resulting in 50-100% durable complete responses, but leaving little room for improvement in combination with drug candidates. Throughout 2019, we have continued efforts to refine this model to enable checkpoint inhibition as a reasonable combination strategy with investigational drug candidates. Herein we present anti-tumor response data in a model of more advanced subcutaneous Hepa 1-6 disease.

Checkpoint Blockade Response Data for Hepa 1-6

Initiating treatment with more advanced Hepa 1-6 tumors (at a mean tumor volume of ~130 mm³) resulted in a favorable response for testing drug candidates in combination with checkpoint blockade. Figure 1 illustrates mean (A) and individual (B-D) growth of control tumors and those treated with anti-mPD-1 or anti-mPD-L1 monotherapy. At this increased starting tumor volume, each monotherapy produced 40% durable complete responses, suggesting that while this strategy can certainly offer a means by which to test rational combination strategies, it is possible that the model can be further optimized. We will continue to refine this model to allow checkpoint blockade to maintain a moderate response, ideally with fewer complete responses. Small differences in mean tumor volume may mean large differences in response, so we are systematically approaching this challenge stepwise, with an ongoing study testing anti-tumor efficacy of checkpoint blockade with dosing initiation at a mean tumor volume of ~150 mm³. This study is not yet complete but is already indicating fewer complete responses compared to lower initiating tumor volumes (data not shown).

Fig. 1: Response to checkpoint inhibition when staging at 130mm3

To further increase utility of this HCC model, we have luciferase-enabled the Hepa 1-6 cell line (Hepa 1-6-luc). This line is currently being optimized for use in orthotopic modeling of liver cancer. The luciferase tag will be used to monitor tumor progression by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) following an implant directly into the liver.

Advisement for Using the Hepa 1-6 Model in Your Next Liver Study

The Hepa 1-6 model provides robust preclinical means by which to study hepatocellular carcinoma. Further, the strong response to checkpoint inhibition coupled with flow cytometry analysis is suggestive of a minimally immunosuppressive tumor micro-environment, therefore, the Hepa 1-6 model can be considered immunologically ?warm.? This immunologically favorable phenotype is highly attractive for those developing therapeutic agents posited to stimulate the immune system.

Please contact us to speak with our scientists about how Hepa 1-6 or one of our other syngeneic models can be used for your next immuno-oncology study.

References

²  https://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/liver-cancer/statistics

³ Pinter M & Peck-Radosvljevic M. 2018. Review article: systemic treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. Sep; 48(6): 598?609.